Communist with three houses says whaaaaat?
Sen. Bernie Sanders (Babbling Moron-Vt.) on Tuesday went after President Trump, calling him “the most racist, sexist, homophobic, bigoted president in history" during a campaign event for Maryland gubernatorial candidate Ben Jealous (D).
Campaign staffers “are working to make sure that the agenda of the most racist, sexist, homophobic, bigoted president in history will go nowhere because Democrats will control the House and the Senate,” Sanders said of campaigns across the country.
I guess that means that the slaveholding US presidents are off the hook. By the way, I might have rewritten that copy a little.
Wednesday, October 31, 2018
Tuesday, October 30, 2018
BREAKING
Claire McCaskill is in WAY worse trouble than I thought.
Speaking exclusively to Fox News on Monday, vulnerable incumbent Missouri Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill dropped the names of two high-profile colleagues, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, when asked to identify the "crazy Democrats" from whom her campaign has distanced itself in recent days. McCaskill said she wouldn't call the two "crazy," but noted they had disagreements with each other.
"The crazy Democrats are people who walk in restaurants and scream in elected officials' faces," McCaskill told "Special Report" anchor Bret Baier. In recent weeks, progressive activists have hounded Republican Sens. Ted Cruz and Mitch McConnell as they ate dinner, as well as Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.
"We have a state senator here in Missouri that actually advocated for the assassination of President Trump. That's a crazy Democrat," McCaskill continued, referring to state Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal, who was censured for her comments last year. "I don't do those things. I am not somebody who thinks that we should ever be uncivil."
Wow.
The fact that Claire's even talking to Fox News at all, never mind what she told them, indicates the toxicity of the national Democratic Party in Missouri. In football terms, what this suggests is that Claire's losing the game by eight points, has the ball on her own half-yard line and has to go 99 and a half yards just have a chance to tie the game and go to overtime.
Her internals must be through the floor and still dropping.
UPDATE: How much trouble is Claire in? A crazy Missouri Democrat is not a fan.
In a scathing series of tweets on Monday and Tuesday, Missouri Democratic state Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal referred to McCaskill as “Dixie Claire,” described her as a “piece of sh_t,” compared her to a slave owner and accused “McCaskill and her racist democratic friends” of alienating the party’s base voters.
“Claire McCaskill is desperate. She’s a piece of sh_t. Instead of knowing why people of color are angered by this administration, she chooses to put us [and] our families in harm’s way,” Chappelle-Nadal wrote in a tweet on Monday.
“If my family is harmed, blame it on Claire McCaskill. She deserves to lose. She is not a Democrat,” the state senator added.
“Claire McCaskill and her racist democratic friends continue to alienate the base,” Chappelle-Nadal wrote in a Tuesday morning tweet. In another she referred to McCaskill as “Dixie Claire.”
When I was growing up, the Democrats ran this state, partly due to the lingering affects of the Civil War which lasted longer here than they did in the rest of the Confederacy. They owned the General Assembly and while there were Republican congressmen here and there, these were usually gerrymandered down to a minimum.
I'll never forget the astonishment at the fact that Episcopal clergyman and Republican John Danforth won election as Missouri's attorney general. But where are we now?
The Republicans control the General Assembly with a vice grip that I can't remember the Democrats ever having. Missouri's governor is a popular Republican and if Claire loses, as I expect she will, both US senators from Missouri will be Republicans while the Democrats will be reduced to a congressional seat in St. Louis and one in Kansas City.
Sic transit Gloria and all that.
Speaking exclusively to Fox News on Monday, vulnerable incumbent Missouri Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill dropped the names of two high-profile colleagues, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, when asked to identify the "crazy Democrats" from whom her campaign has distanced itself in recent days. McCaskill said she wouldn't call the two "crazy," but noted they had disagreements with each other.
"The crazy Democrats are people who walk in restaurants and scream in elected officials' faces," McCaskill told "Special Report" anchor Bret Baier. In recent weeks, progressive activists have hounded Republican Sens. Ted Cruz and Mitch McConnell as they ate dinner, as well as Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.
"We have a state senator here in Missouri that actually advocated for the assassination of President Trump. That's a crazy Democrat," McCaskill continued, referring to state Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal, who was censured for her comments last year. "I don't do those things. I am not somebody who thinks that we should ever be uncivil."
Wow.
The fact that Claire's even talking to Fox News at all, never mind what she told them, indicates the toxicity of the national Democratic Party in Missouri. In football terms, what this suggests is that Claire's losing the game by eight points, has the ball on her own half-yard line and has to go 99 and a half yards just have a chance to tie the game and go to overtime.
Her internals must be through the floor and still dropping.
UPDATE: How much trouble is Claire in? A crazy Missouri Democrat is not a fan.
In a scathing series of tweets on Monday and Tuesday, Missouri Democratic state Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal referred to McCaskill as “Dixie Claire,” described her as a “piece of sh_t,” compared her to a slave owner and accused “McCaskill and her racist democratic friends” of alienating the party’s base voters.
“Claire McCaskill is desperate. She’s a piece of sh_t. Instead of knowing why people of color are angered by this administration, she chooses to put us [and] our families in harm’s way,” Chappelle-Nadal wrote in a tweet on Monday.
“If my family is harmed, blame it on Claire McCaskill. She deserves to lose. She is not a Democrat,” the state senator added.
When I was growing up, the Democrats ran this state, partly due to the lingering affects of the Civil War which lasted longer here than they did in the rest of the Confederacy. They owned the General Assembly and while there were Republican congressmen here and there, these were usually gerrymandered down to a minimum.
I'll never forget the astonishment at the fact that Episcopal clergyman and Republican John Danforth won election as Missouri's attorney general. But where are we now?
The Republicans control the General Assembly with a vice grip that I can't remember the Democrats ever having. Missouri's governor is a popular Republican and if Claire loses, as I expect she will, both US senators from Missouri will be Republicans while the Democrats will be reduced to a congressional seat in St. Louis and one in Kansas City.
Sic transit Gloria and all that.
DESPERATION?
Maybe. Claire McCaskill's a lot of things but one of the things Claire McCaskill isn't is stupid. While Missouri has isolated pockets of radicalism here and there, this place ain't Cali and Claire can't win running as Kammi Harris.
Trump crushed it here two years ago so regardless of their personal views, every Show-Me Democrat's going to have to run way to the right of the national party if they want to have any chance of victory at all. They can always tack back left after they win.
So off the top of my head, I'd say that this statement means that Claire's internal polls must be cratering. Her base won't be enough, the St. Louis and Kansas City suburbs aren't as close as they need to be, she needs more conservative support and she's not getting it.
Trump crushed it here two years ago so regardless of their personal views, every Show-Me Democrat's going to have to run way to the right of the national party if they want to have any chance of victory at all. They can always tack back left after they win.
So off the top of my head, I'd say that this statement means that Claire's internal polls must be cratering. Her base won't be enough, the St. Louis and Kansas City suburbs aren't as close as they need to be, she needs more conservative support and she's not getting it.
Monday, October 29, 2018
TAKE IT TO THE BANK
If some time in the next two to six years, it is announced that a massive asteroid is headed directly toward Earth which will result in the complete destruction of the planet and/or the extinction of all life thereon, Donald Trump will be blamed. For inhibiting science and technology or some other really stupid crap.
In Donald Trump’s abhorrence for globalism and in his inability to smack down David Duke, it was easy to hear the ominous chords of history, to see how he was activating dormant hatreds with his conspiratorial tropes. But it was always easy to see how Jews, with their well-developed institutions and communal resources, were not the most vulnerable targets of Trump’s racialism. I felt pride that so much of the organized Jewish community resisted the impulse to elevate its own problems above those of the more vulnerable.
Of course, this was not every corner of the Jewish community. After the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, Gary Cohn couldn’t bring himself to resign from his job. After Squirrel Hill, Jared Kushner and Sheldon Adelson will likely stand their ground. In response to this massacre, every synagogue will protect itself with great security, with more cameras and more guards. They will do what is necessary to create a sense of safety, which will also invariably inhibit the sense of escaping from the secular world. The gunman committed a crime on Shabbat, and it will reverberate as a crime against Shabbat.
Any strategy for enhancing the security of American Jewry should involve shunning Trump’s Jewish enablers. Their money should be refused, their presence in synagogues not welcome. They have placed their community in danger.
Sure thing. Excommunicate anyone who politically disagrees with you. That'll make anti-Semitism go away. And hey, they can always become Presbyterians or something.
Sunday, October 28, 2018
PERENNIALS
Oh sweet mother of Dal Maxvill, Sally Kohn is a BONECRUSHINGLY stupid person.
This election is really about one question: Do you like your tax breaks more than you love your fellow human beings?
I guess that makes sense if you believe that "love" means giving somebody else's money to anyone and everyone who will promise to keep voting you into high political office.
And that's all that it can possibly ever mean because shut up. But if you happen to have a differing opinion, then you're a Nazi or something so shut up.
Or something.
I can't keep up anymore.
This election is really about one question: Do you like your tax breaks more than you love your fellow human beings?
I guess that makes sense if you believe that "love" means giving somebody else's money to anyone and everyone who will promise to keep voting you into high political office.
And that's all that it can possibly ever mean because shut up. But if you happen to have a differing opinion, then you're a Nazi or something so shut up.
Or something.
I can't keep up anymore.
SERIOUSLY?
To a certain class of European, any murder of any Jew anywhere is always the fault of the Jews.
UPDATE: Really, bitch? You're actually going to go there?
UPDATE: Really, bitch? You're actually going to go there?
Saturday, October 27, 2018
THE WHEELS ON THE BUS FLY OFF AND OFF
Look at it this way, Claire. At the very least, you'll come out of this with a lobbying gig with Murder Inc. Sons Of Nazi Concentration Camp Guards Pol Pot Was Right And You Know It Cooking With Baby Parts Planned Parenthood. Won't be much help to that money-grubbing sack of crap you're married to but if you want to make an omelette and all that.
There’s brutal and then there’s BRUTAL and this is the latter.
During a Missouri Senate debate, Democrat incumbent Claire McCaskill was busted in a bald-faced lie.
The issue of Project Veritas’ undercover videos arose during the debate. McCaskill accused Hawley of being involved in the videos and then all but demanded Hawley (the state’s AG) investigate Project Veritas.
McCaskill interrupted him and said, “I didn’t say that on television.”
SPOILER: She said that on television.
“Well, it is startling that Josh Hawley would be part of fraudulently embedding somebody in my campaign. He’s the Attorney General of the state of Missouri. He’s supposed to be going after fraud, not participating in it,” she said. On television.
Mad props, as always, to Katherine.
There’s brutal and then there’s BRUTAL and this is the latter.
During a Missouri Senate debate, Democrat incumbent Claire McCaskill was busted in a bald-faced lie.
The issue of Project Veritas’ undercover videos arose during the debate. McCaskill accused Hawley of being involved in the videos and then all but demanded Hawley (the state’s AG) investigate Project Veritas.
Again, Hawley denied being involved in the videos and said, “and to accuse me of fraud, which is what Senator McCaskill did. She said that I committed fraud. That I participated in a fraud. She said that on television."
McCaskill interrupted him and said, “I didn’t say that on television.”
SPOILER: She said that on television.
“Well, it is startling that Josh Hawley would be part of fraudulently embedding somebody in my campaign. He’s the Attorney General of the state of Missouri. He’s supposed to be going after fraud, not participating in it,” she said. On television.
Mad props, as always, to Katherine.
JEFF GOLDSTEIN SEZ
The left will once again overplay its hand & tie half the country to a series of bomb threats — then be genuinely shocked when millions of people who’ve never sent bombs react to being accused of terrorism by digging in further against the witch hunters and their sad Inquisition.
Friday, October 26, 2018
THIS...IS FNN
Know what NBC stands for? Not Been Covering.
NBC News published a bombshell report Thursday that undercut claims made by Michael Avenatti and his client, Julie Swetnick, regarding Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
The company is coming under fire in the wake of the report because the series of events its Thursday report described occurred three weeks ago, before the Senate voted on whether to confirm Kavanaugh. The conservative jurist was confirmed by a narrow 50-48 margin on Oct. 6.
NBC did not respond to requests for comment about why they withheld the story for so long.
We are told that reporters hate Trump's term "fake news" because it's "divisive" or something. If that is, in fact, the case, then why have so many mainstream US "journalists" been working so incredibly hard lately to prove Trump's exact point?
For almost a month, NBC deliberately sat on information that could have and probably would have killed the Kavanaugh controversy deader than Cicero. How can anyone possibly interpret that as anything other than open hostility to Trump and to most of the United States?
If it walks like a duck, Chuck Todd. And you still wonder why Trump won.
Of course, none of this is a surprise to anyone with a functional brain. Most of us watched for eight years as Barack Obama wasn't substantively covered at all. But I guess "journalism" is hard when you spend all that time with your lips on the presidential junk.
He's our guy. Don't rock the boat.
So don't expect me to get even remotely concerned about the utter contempt in which American "journalism's" practitioners are currently held. You people have earned every bit of it.
And you, and only you, are the only ones who can fix it.
Because we're not going to fix it for you. Makes me no never mind if we plow your whole profession under and start completely anew.
NBC News published a bombshell report Thursday that undercut claims made by Michael Avenatti and his client, Julie Swetnick, regarding Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
The company is coming under fire in the wake of the report because the series of events its Thursday report described occurred three weeks ago, before the Senate voted on whether to confirm Kavanaugh. The conservative jurist was confirmed by a narrow 50-48 margin on Oct. 6.
NBC did not respond to requests for comment about why they withheld the story for so long.
We are told that reporters hate Trump's term "fake news" because it's "divisive" or something. If that is, in fact, the case, then why have so many mainstream US "journalists" been working so incredibly hard lately to prove Trump's exact point?
For almost a month, NBC deliberately sat on information that could have and probably would have killed the Kavanaugh controversy deader than Cicero. How can anyone possibly interpret that as anything other than open hostility to Trump and to most of the United States?
If it walks like a duck, Chuck Todd. And you still wonder why Trump won.
Of course, none of this is a surprise to anyone with a functional brain. Most of us watched for eight years as Barack Obama wasn't substantively covered at all. But I guess "journalism" is hard when you spend all that time with your lips on the presidential junk.
He's our guy. Don't rock the boat.
So don't expect me to get even remotely concerned about the utter contempt in which American "journalism's" practitioners are currently held. You people have earned every bit of it.
And you, and only you, are the only ones who can fix it.
Because we're not going to fix it for you. Makes me no never mind if we plow your whole profession under and start completely anew.
DEAL WITH THE DIABLA
Got a proposition for you, kitten. Give us back Turtle Bay, I'm sure we could turn it into office space or something. You know the Manhattan real estate market.
Officially move that whole excrement festival to Geneva or Brussels or Berlin or anywhere else you care to go. Then follow it there. FYI, this country won't be joining you.
The United States, whose taxpayers account for some $10 billion a year in contributions to the United Nations system, was criticized at a meeting in New York on Tuesday for being late with its payments, with Cuba leading the charge – and suggesting it should be paying more.
“We know full well who is responsible for the current critical financial situation of the organization,” Cuban Ambassador Anayansi Rodriguez told the General Assembly’s budget committee. It was “alarming,” she said, that the biggest debts to the U.N. were the responsibility of one country – the United States.
Rodriguez suggested the U.S. should be paying more than 22 percent of the regular budget, complaining that it had pressed for a reduction of the ceiling to 22 percent, down from 39.89 percent in 1946.
“It is also alarming that this same country talks about getting better returns on its investment in the United Nations,” she said. “This shows that it considers international peace and security, development and human rights, as a business.”
I know you Commies don't know anything about business. Or international peace and security, development and human rights, for that matter. So here's a quick financial tip. When you spend all of your time flushing your money down the toilet, nobody wants to listen to you bitch about how broke you always seem to be.
UPDATE: Or you could move the whole sick joke to Frisco. You wouldn't be in a different country yet but most of us think that will soon be remedied. But you'd be in Cali which means that you'd be among people just like you who think that there isn't a problem in the world that can't be solved with somebody else's money.
Officially move that whole excrement festival to Geneva or Brussels or Berlin or anywhere else you care to go. Then follow it there. FYI, this country won't be joining you.
The United States, whose taxpayers account for some $10 billion a year in contributions to the United Nations system, was criticized at a meeting in New York on Tuesday for being late with its payments, with Cuba leading the charge – and suggesting it should be paying more.
“We know full well who is responsible for the current critical financial situation of the organization,” Cuban Ambassador Anayansi Rodriguez told the General Assembly’s budget committee. It was “alarming,” she said, that the biggest debts to the U.N. were the responsibility of one country – the United States.
Rodriguez suggested the U.S. should be paying more than 22 percent of the regular budget, complaining that it had pressed for a reduction of the ceiling to 22 percent, down from 39.89 percent in 1946.
“It is also alarming that this same country talks about getting better returns on its investment in the United Nations,” she said. “This shows that it considers international peace and security, development and human rights, as a business.”
I know you Commies don't know anything about business. Or international peace and security, development and human rights, for that matter. So here's a quick financial tip. When you spend all of your time flushing your money down the toilet, nobody wants to listen to you bitch about how broke you always seem to be.
UPDATE: Or you could move the whole sick joke to Frisco. You wouldn't be in a different country yet but most of us think that will soon be remedied. But you'd be in Cali which means that you'd be among people just like you who think that there isn't a problem in the world that can't be solved with somebody else's money.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)