Friday, November 2, 2018

KANSAS-NEBRASKA II

In a perfect world, this Senate Judiciary Committee letter would accomplish two things. It would reelect Donald Trump in 2020.  And any presidential aspirations Kamala Harris might entertain would be deader than whatever's left of William Henry Harrison.  Selections follow.

I am once again writing regarding fabricated allegations the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary recently received. As you know, the Senate Judiciary Committee processed the nomination of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh to serve as an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States, leading to his eventual confirmation on October 6, 2018. As part of that process, the Committee has investigated various allegations made against Judge Kavanaugh. The Committee’s investigation has involved communicating with numerous individuals claiming to have relevant information. While many of those individuals have provided the Committee information in good faith, it unfortunately appears some have not. As explained below, I am writing to refer Ms. Judy Munro-Leighton for investigation of potential violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 (materially false statements) and 1505 (obstruction), for materially false statements she made to the Committee during the course of the Committee’s investigation.

On September 25, 2018, staffers for Senator Harris, a Committee member, referred an undated handwritten letter to Committee investigators that her California office had received signed under the alias “Jane Doe” from Oceanside, California. The letter contained highly graphic
sexual-assault accusations against Judge Kavanaugh. The anonymous accuser alleged that Justice Kavanaugh and a friend had raped her “several times each” in the backseat of a car. In addition to being from an anonymous accuser, the letter listed no return address, failed to provide any timeframe, and failed to provide any location -- beyond an automobile -- in which these alleged incidents took place.

Then, on October 3, 2018, Committee staff received an email from a Ms. Judy Munro-Leighton with a subject line claiming: “I am Jane Doe from Oceanside CA -- Kavanaugh raped me.”  Ms. Munro-Leighton wrote that she was “sharing with you the story of the night that Brett Kavanaugh and his friend sexually assaulted and raped me in his car” and referred to “the letterthat I sent to Sen. Kamala Harris on Sept. 19 with details of this vicious assault.” She continued: “I know that [‘]Jane Doe[’] will get no media attention, but I am deathly afraid of revealing any information about myself or my family.” She then included a typed version of the Jane Doe letter. 

Eventually, on November 1, 2018, Committee investigators connected with Ms. Munro-Leighton by phone and spoke with her about the sexual-assault allegations against Judge Kavanaugh she had made to the Committee. Under questioning by Committee investigators, Ms. Munro-Leighton admitted, contrary to her prior claims, that she had not been sexually assaulted by Judge Kavanaugh and was not the author of the original “Jane Doe” letter. When directly asked by Committee investigators if she was, as she had claimed, the “Jane Doe” from Oceanside, California who had sent the letter to Senator Harris, she admitted: “No, no, no. I did that as a way to grab attention. I am not Jane Doe . . . but I did read Jane Doe’s letter. I read the transcript of the call to your Committee. . . . I saw it online. It was news.”

She further confessed to Committee investigators that (1) she “just wanted to get attention”; (2) “it was a tactic”; and (3) “that was just a ploy.” She told Committee investigators that she had called Congress multiple times during the Kavanaugh hearing process – including prior to the time Dr. Ford’s allegations surfaced – to oppose his nomination. Regarding the false sexual-assault allegation she made via her email to the Committee, she said: “I was angry, and I sent it out.”
 
And now for the punch line.
 
When asked by Committee investigators whether she had ever met Judge Kavanaugh, she said: “Oh Lord, no.”
 
Read the whole thing.
 
In a perfect world, other things should also happen.  This woman and ANYONE else directly or indirectly involved in this hit job, for that's all it ever was, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.  I'm not interested in jail time for any of them.  Having to explain a felony conviction to a future prospective employer or voter is more than enough punishment.
 
In a perfect world, most Starbucks baristas or McDonald's drive-through window people would be unemployable poli-sci majors.
 
In a perfect world, American "journalists" would take a long, hard look at themselves and their alleged "profession."  And that class of "conservative" writers and politicians who would rather gouge out their own eyes and eardrums rather than say anything nice about Donald Trump would realize just how much the American left hates them and always will.
 
But we won't live in a perfect world until Jesus returns.

2 comments:

nikkolayebba said...

Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thanks Nonetheless I'm experiencing concern with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting an identical rss problem? Anyone who is aware of kindly respond. Thnkx free online casino slots

Katherine said...

So at this point we still don't know who wrote the original anonymous letter, which always sounded preposterous anyhow. The referrals of Avenatti and his unbelievable female accuser, Swetnick, and this woman who wrote a false letter, are a very good step towards preventing this kind of outrage in the future.

As I recall, it was Kamala Harris who entered both the Swetnick lies and this anonymous rape letter into the Judicial Committee record. So much for evidence and investigative work before allegations are made public.