I was going to post something about how horrible it was that so many staffers at a publication as important as National Review came so enthusiastically to the conclusion that a bunch of Catholic high school kids from Kentucky were slimebags, how National Review "apologized" only for its journalistic mistakes and not for the fact that they libeled kids and how National Review doesn't matter anymore. But then I read this Kevin Williamson column.
Let me be direct about this: You people are a bunch of hysterical ninnies, and it is time for you to grow the hell up.
You know who you are.
The Covington fiasco has proved to be a clarifying moment. And here is what has been made clear: Much of the American media is no longer engaged in journalism. It is engaged in opposition research and in what is sometimes known among political operatives as “black p.r.”—the sinister twin of ordinary public relations. As Joy Behar, as profoundly dim and tedious a person as American public life has to offer, forthrightly confessed: The hysteria and outright dishonesty surrounding the Covington students had nothing to do with them. It has to do with narrowly partisan, selfish, deeply stupid, entirely unpatriotic, childish, foot-stamping, fingers-in-the-ears, weeping, cooties-loathing, teary-eyed, tremulous, quavering, pansified, gormless, deceitful, dishonorable, and cynical politics of the lowest kind — the politics of Us and Them.
To be honest, I can't remember the last time I personally had any gorm but Kevin gets better.
And the fact that a couple of children in MAGA hats engaged in boorish behavior — which isn’t even a fact, as it turns out, but a lie constructed and wholesaled with malice aforethought — wouldn’t have told us one damn thing about Donald J. Trump, his administration, or his political supporters at large. The fact that we had a momentary national moral crisis over the (as is turns out, fictitious) actions of a couple of nobody teenagers is all the evidence anybody needs of the fundamentally hysterical and unserious times in which we live. In a sane world, nobody cares about whether a 16-year-old boy somewhere . . . smirked.
WAY better.
Everybody who has pretended like that smirk tells us something serious about the state of the world is a liar and a fraud. I don’t mean the people who were legitimately taken in by the deceit — especially those who have had the honor and self-respect to admit their errors and correct them — but those who willfully persist in the lie. I’m talking about you, Ruth Graham of Slate, still trying to justify by whatever pathetic means are available what everybody with any sense knows to have been an exercise in pure horses***. I’m talking about you, editors of the New York Times. You sorry specimens are poor excuses for journalists, which, of course, we already knew. What’s more relevant here is that you are bad citizens. Trafficking in lies and distortions because you think the guy in the White House is kind of gross is unworthy of adults with responsible positions in a free society that depends on honest and functional institutions.
Of course Alyssa Milano is an idiot for insisting that those stupid red hats are “the new white hood.” You know who is even more idiotic than Alyssa Milano? Anybody who gives the furry crack of a rat’s patootie what Alyssa Milano thinks about anything. She’s a moron at 500 yards and a lunatic at a thousand. You know it. If she happens to be a moron and a lunatic who is on your side, that doesn’t make her any less of a moron and a lunatic. And making common cause with morons and lunatics can backfire: Ask a conservative about Ted Nugent.
Read the whole thing.
8 comments:
Could not have said this any better!
Kevin Williamson is as close as modern writers get to Mike Royko, and Kevin actually has a broader ranging mind.
Which should frighten people.
I'm really beginning to wonder what will it take for people to look at something like this objectively and maybe say, "I was wrong." or "I was lied to by the press." For most people there is a tipping point. Maybe it has to involve them personally, as with most of the #Walk Away people.
I was irritated with National Review, especially that dreadful post put up by their deputy editor. However, they're still publishing Victor Davis Hanson, Andrew McCarthy, and Williamson. This is a good one!
Whenever I see a "hate crime" report, or something like this that initially looks really bad for our side, I wait 48 hours to see what the real story was. Far more often than not, initial impressions are totally wrong. I even wait when the initial impressions seem to favor my point of view. Far too many people today are willing to go hysterical over nothing or not much.
Katherine, This is all being orchestrated by the press and what is the result?
I read Bp. Robert Barron's daily Gospel reflections and he has pointed out on several occasions that the devil always seeks to create confusion, chaos, and unrest. The demonic tendency is to divide.
Oh, TLM, I think Satan is having a wonderful time these days, fomenting all the irrational hate going around.
Right. At the Passion, all he had was a handful of angry priests & an unruly crowd. Today, he has the Internet.
Interestingly, Bp. Barron has mentioned the demonic tendency to divide in his Gospel reflection for today.
"Friends, in today’s Gospel Jesus is accused of being in league with Satan. Some of the witnesses said, "By the power of Beelzebul, the prince of demons, he drives out demons."
Jesus’ response is wonderful in its logic and laconicism: "If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand. And if a house is divided against itself, that house will not be able to stand. And if Satan has risen up against himself and is divided, he cannot stand."
The demonic power is always one of scattering. It breaks up communion. But Jesus, as always, is the voice of communio, of one bringing things back together."
Post a Comment