Sunday, January 20, 2019

BAT BOY

How Buzzfeed became the Weekly World News.

When a BuzzFeed reporter first sought comment on the news outlet’s explosive report that President Trump had directed his lawyer to lie to Congress, the spokesman for special counsel Robert S. Mueller III treated the request as he would almost any other story.

The reporter informed Mueller’s spokesman, Peter Carr, that he and a colleague had “a story coming stating that Michael Cohen was directed by President Trump himself to lie to Congress about his negotiations related to the Trump Moscow project,” according to copies of their emails provided by a BuzzFeed spokesman. Importantly, the reporter made no reference to the special counsel’s office specifically or evidence that Mueller’s investigators had uncovered.

The innocuous exchange belied the chaos it would produce. When BuzzFeed published the story hours later, it far exceeded Carr’s initial impression, people familiar with the matter said, in that the reporting alleged that Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer and self-described fixer, “told the special counsel that after the election, the president personally instructed him to lie,” and that Mueller’s office learned of the directive “through interviews with multiple witnesses from the Trump Organization and internal company emails, text messages, and a cache of other documents.”

In the view of the special counsel’s office, that was wrong, two people familiar with the matter said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. And with Democrats raising the specter of investigation and impeachment, Mueller’s team started discussing a step they had never before taken: publicly disputing reporting on evidence in their ongoing investigation.

Within 24 hours of the story’s publication, the special counsel’s office issued a statement doing just that. Trump, who has called the media the “enemy of the people,” on Saturday pointed to the special counsel’s assertion as evidence of what he sees as journalists’ bias against him.

“I think that the BuzzFeed piece was a disgrace to our country. It was a disgrace to journalism, and I think also that the coverage by the mainstream media was disgraceful, and I think it’s going to take a long time for the mainstream media to recover its credibility,” Trump said Saturday. “It’s lost tremendous credibility. And believe me, that hurts me when I see that.”

Google this or wander around Twitter for a while.  The fact of the matter is that nobody is buying this story.  I think even CNN's Chris Cuomo thought Buzzfeed had screwed the pooch in a major way.  It may be a generation or three before Buzzfeed gets back whatever journalistic reputation it once had.

If it ever does.

UPDATE: Of course it's not like any of the American news media has any credibility left.

UPDATE:  Right, Buzzfeed.  This will fix everything.

1 comment:

Katherine said...

Thanks for the Reason link. That's the best summary I've seen. What people need to explain is why on earth they thought a group of Catholic pro-life high school students from Kentucky would be ugly to an older Indian guy. What? People should at least think about whether the situation presented makes any sense before issuing condemnations. We know liberals are nuts. What are the excuses for the conservatives who bought this garbage?