Tuesday, April 7, 2020

THAT WAS THEN, THIS IS NOW

Q-list actress Alyssa Milano reintroduces herself to Due Process.

Celebrity Alyssa Milano — who is famous now mostly for having once been famous — has lately become an expert in this sort of hypocrisy, as she has cashed in her social-media currency to become a useless fixture of our increasingly useless political debates.

One of her more memorable crusades in recent memory was on behalf of failed 2017 Democratic congressional candidate Jon Ossoff, who attempted to win an open seat in a Georgia district in which he didn’t reside. But perhaps her most vocal campaign has been as a self-fashioned leader of the #MeToo movement. In this role, she has often invoked the ill-conceived “believe all women” principle by which we are required to reflexively assume that every woman who alleges sexual harassment or assault is telling the truth.

Which she made a disgustingly public show of during the Kavanaugh hearings.

During the lengthy smear campaign against Brett Kavanaugh — in which the nominee’s ideological opponents attempted to tank his confirmation by entertaining unsubstantiated allegations of sexual misconduct — Milano became one of the most vehement anti-Kavanaugh voices.
When one of Kavanaugh’s accusers, Christine Blasey Ford, gave her public statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Milano attended the hearing, sitting well within view of the C-Span and network cameras. She was there, she said, “to show support for Doctor Ford, to stand in solidarity with other women, other survivors that have been through similar experiences.”

Since women's accusations are always true, actual facts are a waste of time.

“If professor Christine Blasey Ford is to be believed, and I believe she is, Brett Kavanaugh is a sexual predator,” Milano wrote in a CNN op-ed in October 2018. In one tweet at the time, she shared a statement from discredited Kavanaugh accuser Debbie Ramirez.

Apparently, she thought that the FBI should “reach out” to Michael Avenatti and Julie Swetnick, who, without witnesses or evidence, accused Kavanaugh of vicious sexual crimes.

Since the dawn of the #MeToo movement, Milano has presented herself as a consistent advocate for women, staunchly refusing to survey the available evidence in each accusation and instead mechanically adopting the position that accused men are always guilty.

Until now anyway.

No longer. In the wake of sexual-misconduct allegations against Joe Biden, whom Milano has endorsed for president, the #MeToo maven appears to have discovered the long-forgotten notion of due process.

In an interview yesterday afternoon, Milano explained her decision to continue endorsing Biden, even as she defended her position of believing women’s testimony, saying that “for so long, the go-to has been not to believe them.”

“We really have to sort of societally change that mindset to believing women,” she continued. “But that does not mean at the expense of giving men their due process and investigating situations, and it’s got to be fair in both directions.”

Whatever the hell that means.  Actually, cupcake, the "mindset" that has to change is the "mindset" that you displayed during the Kavanaugh hearings when you were enthusiastically willing to destroy the career and the reputation of a man based on nothing other than the fact that he was the candidate of the other guy.  You don't get the privilege of suddenly finding the virtue of due process when Joe Biden, who you back for president, is accused to taking sexual liberties with one of his aides.

Take a seat and keep your mouth shut, junior.

3 comments:

Art Deco said...

As always, Calvinball.

BillB said...

Worthless witch.

Art Deco said...

The culture of the Democratic Party is such that she's perfectly normal. This asininity goes all the way down, btw. I have little doubt the overwhelming majority of committed Democrats among our friends and relations have reasoning processes just like hers. Again, the case against Brett Kavanaugh was so insubstantial as to be frankly silly. The next time I cross paths with a partisan Democrat who acknowledges that will be the first. At least in re Thomas and Hill, there was no doubt the two were acquainted and had worked in the same suite of offices for several years. We live in low dishonest times.