Friday, September 27, 2019

FASCINATING

Welcome to America's first slow-motion coup d'état.  The coffee's fresh and free and somebody brought several metric tons of donuts.














Between May 2018 and August 2019, the intelligence community secretly eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct, first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoings. This raises questions about the intelligence community’s behavior regarding the August submission of a whistleblower complaint against President Donald Trump. The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.

The brand new version of the whistleblower complaint form, which was not made public until after the transcript of Trump’s July 25 phone call with the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and the complaint addressed to Congress were made public, eliminates the first-hand knowledge requirement and allows employees to file whistleblower complaints even if they have zero direct knowledge of underlying evidence and only “heard about [wrongdoing] from others.”

The internal properties of the newly revised “Disclosure of Urgent Concern” form, which the intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) requires to be submitted under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act (ICWPA), show that the document was uploaded on September 24, 2019, at 4:25 p.m., just days before the anti-Trump complaint was declassified and released to the public. The markings on the document state that it was revised in August 2019, but no specific date of revision is disclosed.

Phase Two: when the bodies start turning up.

#WhatsADeepState

#IKnowNothingNUTHThing

5 comments:

Katherine said...

What's fascinating is there's no uproar in the MSM, and never has been, over Joe Biden's bragging on video about doing exactly what they claim (falsely) that Trump did -- threatening to withhold a huge aid package unless Ukraine fired an official the US administration considered bad. He may, in fact, have been corrupt; just about everything in Ukraine is corrupt, which is why this (literal) comedian got elected as president. Ukrainians are sick of the mess. But Biden's claim that he didn't know his son was being paid $50k per month by Burisma, the prosecutor's target, is not credible. The obvious conflict of interest meant that Biden should not have been involved in US policy in Ukraine at all.

Dr. Mabuse said...

Doesn't the Jeffrey Epstein case demonstrate that Phase II is already in operation?

unreconstructed rebel said...

The obvious conflict of interest meant that Biden should not have been involved in US policy in Ukraine at all.

Correct. The VP of the United States has absolutely no Constitutional duty when it come to foreign affairs. He is President of the Senate, full stop. He has no other governmental responsibility other than waiting for POTUS to drop dead.

Katherine said...

ur, you're right, it's not part of the VP's job description. However, the president can delegate tasks to him. Why not use someone on the federal payroll, after all? But Biden should never have been on this task because of the conflict of interest. There's another glaring example with China and Hunter Biden's contracts there, following his visits flying with his dad on Air Force Two.

The Little Myrmidon said...

Biden's son, Hunter, had two interesting partners: 1. James Bulger, nephew of Whitey (convicted murderer) and William Bulger (former MA State Senate President;) and 2. Christopher Heinz, step-son of John Kerry (Secretary of State at the time.)

Nice crew.